I’ve already noted and commented on my first impressions of the current lawsuit filed on behalf of an allegedly “wrongfully terminated” NASCAR official.
Let me preface this by saying I have little doubt within NASCAR there are a few knuckle-dragging Neanderthals inhabiting the place that could stoop as low as the lawsuit claims. Anything is possible, and likely.
However, unless there’s some Utopian Universe I’m not aware of where it doesn’t happen these backward Ape-like creatures are in every part of Earth’s social and economic fabric and to deny it is insulting everyone’s intellect.
That said, I’ve since had opportunity to read the actual court papers as filed Tuesday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The damn thing reads like an indictment of the KKK not NASCAR. Again, it’s possible, but it just smells of a grand pile-on of epic proportions.
The first 19 items listed are the run-of-the-mill things seen in most law papers but the choice of venue caught me eye. NY was chosen because NASCAR sanctions events at Watkins Glen so legally speaking it gives that court jurisdiction. But for those wary of the tricks shysters play I’m also thinking NY was at the top of their preferred places to find an anti-NASCAR jury. Know what I mean Eugene?!
Now on to some of the meat and potatoes and items 22-23 contained in the suit:
22. Throughout her employment at Defendant NASCAR, Plaintiff MAURICIA GRANT was treated differently than Whites and men similarly employed by Defendant NASCAR because she is Black and a woman.
23. This disparate treatment included Plaintiff MAURICIA GRANT’s subjection to virulently racist harassment, a racially hostile work environment, and insidious and pervasive race discrimination reflective of a former, uglier era in our nation’s history when Blacks were denied the most fundamental civil rights, including equal protection under the law. Such conduct should have been eradicated from the workplace long ago. Instead, the directors, officers, supervisors, managers, officials, employees and/or agents of Defendant NASCAR perpetuated, condoned and actively participated in calculated acts of ugly racist bigotry designed to humiliate and degrade its lone Black female Official.
She, or rather her shysters claim she was treated differently yet later the claim is made her job performance - and quoting court papers - “was rated by NASCAR Busch Series Director Joe Balash a 3.5 out of 5 (5 being the highest score), or “above average.” (None of the Officials received a “5.”)”
Again quoting the filing: “Plaintiff was one of the few female Officials who was Pit-Road Certified (i.e., qualified to go over the wall into the pit and monitor the racing crews to ensure that during the course of the approximately 14-second pit stops, their race cars and crews complied with all of the NASCAR rules.)”
On the face of it that doesn’t appear to be discriminatory, in fact she’s been rated only one half of one point below her peers AND given a job few others of her gender has ever be handed.
But lets continue with items 25 and 26 where names are named:
25. From approximately January 2005 through her unlawful termination on or about October 27, 2007, Jim Cassidy, Joe Balash, Scott French, Mike Dolan, Star George, Jay Altizer, Craig Anderson, Jason Brownlow, Jason Covel, Jonathon Dickerson, Dennis Dillon, David Duke, Mike Dumas, Dan Fenwrick, Shaun Johnson, Tim Knox, Rick Noble, Alan Shepard, Walt Sova, Mike Weddle, Bill Whelan, Dennis Wodzewoda, Mike Wilford and/or other NASCAR Directors, Supervisors, Managers and Officials subjected Plaintiff MAURICIA GRANT to an ongoing pattern of racial and sexual harassment and discrimination because she is a Black woman.
26. This disparate treatment further included different standards of conduct, unequal work assignments, unequal opportunities, unequal promotion, and unequal disciplinary measures directed toward Plaintiff and other African-American and/or female employees as opposed to Caucasian and/or male employees similarly employed by and situated at Defendant NASCAR. This disparate treatment culminated in Plaintiff’s wrongful termination.
“Disparate treatment” except for the indisputable fact she was rated at or just a tick under her peers in job performance.
That’s some list of names isn’t it? As I said it reads like an indictment of the KKK or some other white supremest group than an organization that has been making every attempt at courting and promoting minorities.
I find it very hard, bordering on impossible, to believe all the people named are remotely culpable in this indictment. One or two maybe, I’ll even concede a half a dozen or so but not a laundry list of 24 plus other unnamed “other NASCAR Directors, Supervisors, Managers and Officials.”
Sorry, it doesn’t just smell of BS, it smells of BS wrapped in a fine patina of horse dung and tossed into the court system by the plaintiff’s co-conspirators shysters hoping something sticks.
Will something stick?
Probably, NASCAR doesn’t operate within the aforementioned Utopian Universe and there has to a knuckle dragger or two within its employ but to think all those named not only actively participated but looked the other way when one or more complaints were made is absurd.
And finally I’d be remiss in not noting the quotes issued by the one individual named in the suit that has spoken out.
Mike Wilford, a former NASCAR official who’s named in the suit and has since left NASCAR has spoken to the Associated Press saying he was present for many of the incidents Grant lists in her suit, said she was a willing participant in much of the behavior and had “twisted” the versions to her benefit.
“Graphic and lewd jokes? She participated in them. She laughed, she would never say it was inappropriate,” Wilford said. “She asked to be called the only two names she was ever called. She called herself Mo Money all the time.”
He’s named in Grant’s suit for an incident in March 2006 at Atlanta Motor Speedway when Wilford allegedly showed Grant some loose diamonds and rubies and offered them to Grant if she’d be his mistress.
“That’s just one the many incidents she’s twisted into her favor in the suit,” Wilford said. “Yes, I made the joke, but it was a joke because Mo used to go around telling everyone she wanted to marry a rich man and be a kept woman, and that was all she was after. She told everyone that, and now she’s twisting behavior she both initiated in and participated in.”
How not so shocking and something I’m oh, so… privy to during my time in the Navy and as an official military bailiff in 15-18 such discrimination trials under the UCMJ. In all but 2 cases they were tossed out because of what Wilford is describing or something similar.
Again, let me restate for the record, she may have a case but not as filed where she’s accused the entire Nationwide chain-of-command of active participation or complacency in the matter. That’s just flat-out bullshit.
Technorati Tags: NASCAR, Mauricia Grant, Nationwide Series, Full Throttle