<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugh Grant, Max Mosley and Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy</link>
	<description>A Member of the Thunder Lounge Network</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://thunderlounge.com/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomason</title>
		<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-6391</guid>
		<description>In all the detail and thought set out by Mr. Justice in ruling for Mosley, it was surprising that he never reached the point of balancing the interest of FIA members in knowing that Mosley had a secret life against the intrusion of his privacy.  In the opening, the Justice lays out the balancing test, but when finally the topic arrives in parags. 122 &#38; 123, he concludes that if there was no Nazi theme, then that removes all need to balance the private with the public interest.  Maybe the NOTW's lawyers gave away a general, public interest defense, but if not, then for the court never to balance one person's desire for privacy about illicit conduct against the public interest in knowing about the character of public figures is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the detail and thought set out by Mr. Justice in ruling for Mosley, it was surprising that he never reached the point of balancing the interest of FIA members in knowing that Mosley had a secret life against the intrusion of his privacy.  In the opening, the Justice lays out the balancing test, but when finally the topic arrives in parags. 122 &amp; 123, he concludes that if there was no Nazi theme, then that removes all need to balance the private with the public interest.  Maybe the NOTW&#8217;s lawyers gave away a general, public interest defense, but if not, then for the court never to balance one person&#8217;s desire for privacy about illicit conduct against the public interest in knowing about the character of public figures is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-5128</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-5128</guid>
		<description>Hey larry king would be just as good as appearing in the Jordanian desert.

King reads his interview questions straight off a paper and never asks a followup question. Max could write the questions hand them to larry and away they go on the interview of the century. (in their minds)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey larry king would be just as good as appearing in the Jordanian desert.</p>
<p>King reads his interview questions straight off a paper and never asks a followup question. Max could write the questions hand them to larry and away they go on the interview of the century. (in their minds)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterg</title>
		<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>peterg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/hugh-grant-max-mosley-and-privacy#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Jeesh marc you are cruel......expecting poor Max to appear on Larry King &#38; confess all....LOL.

Legal suit;shmeegal suit I say, Murdoch has platoons of lawyers let Max fight them if he wants....but he can do it on this own time &#38; his own dime, not as FIA President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeesh marc you are cruel&#8230;&#8230;expecting poor Max to appear on Larry King &amp; confess all&#8230;.LOL.</p>
<p>Legal suit;shmeegal suit I say, Murdoch has platoons of lawyers let Max fight them if he wants&#8230;.but he can do it on this own time &amp; his own dime, not as FIA President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
