<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Well Deserved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/this-is-well-deserved/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/this-is-well-deserved</link>
	<description>A Member of the Thunder Lounge Network</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://thunderlounge.com/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/this-is-well-deserved#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/2005/04/22/this-is-well-deserved/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Damm Mayor, feeling guilty?

You have just proved my point that this issue created a situation where all reasoning was cast to the winds and passion ruled the day.

First you make an assumption about who I refered to ("when i said Johnson cheated") then go on a 90 word rant in an apparent attempt to justify yourself.

For the record my reference to "outright lies" had nothing to do with your post or any of your respones to it. I suggest you reread that thread, bet you can find more than one case of lies being passed off as "fact."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damm Mayor, feeling guilty?</p>
<p>You have just proved my point that this issue created a situation where all reasoning was cast to the winds and passion ruled the day.</p>
<p>First you make an assumption about who I refered to (&#8221;when i said Johnson cheated&#8221;) then go on a 90 word rant in an apparent attempt to justify yourself.</p>
<p>For the record my reference to &#8220;outright lies&#8221; had nothing to do with your post or any of your respones to it. I suggest you reread that thread, bet you can find more than one case of lies being passed off as &#8220;fact.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mayorjimmy</title>
		<link>http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/this-is-well-deserved#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>mayorjimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fullthrottle.cranialcavity.net/2005/04/22/this-is-well-deserved/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I suppose you think the "outright lies" was when i said Johnson cheated.  i mean, he didn't admit it so of course he couldn't have cheated right?  not jimmie johnson.....he and the 48 team NEVER do anything wrong!!  so answer me this.  if it wasn't cheating, why did the 25 point penalty stick?  if the rule infraction was beyond their control why wouldn't the 25 point penalty be revoked as well?  The answer is, it was cheating but since his crew chief didn't own up to it like a man and played the denial game of "you can't prove anything" they were forced to revoke the crew chief suspensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you think the &#8220;outright lies&#8221; was when i said Johnson cheated.  i mean, he didn&#8217;t admit it so of course he couldn&#8217;t have cheated right?  not jimmie johnson&#8230;..he and the 48 team NEVER do anything wrong!!  so answer me this.  if it wasn&#8217;t cheating, why did the 25 point penalty stick?  if the rule infraction was beyond their control why wouldn&#8217;t the 25 point penalty be revoked as well?  The answer is, it was cheating but since his crew chief didn&#8217;t own up to it like a man and played the denial game of &#8220;you can&#8217;t prove anything&#8221; they were forced to revoke the crew chief suspensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
